Gregory hi,

I'm sorry, I still don't see how next time an event like on the 8th of
November happens (which, correct me if i'm wrong, was a system wide issue),
I will have any tools to confront it. Your suggestion to pay the $500 fee,
seems to be the only solution (also suggested here by Google's BizDev
representatives in the GDD and later discussions). However, this and the
custom domain SSL price makes GAE a very (very, very) expensive solution
compared to EC2.

Also please note that there is still no information (even not just the
basic of basic information) regarding the 8th of November spike.
Transparency helps making your clients feel more assured of the product you
are giving them.

If you wish to discuss this further, you may email me. However, needless to
say, we have recently started working on transporting our system to EC2, so
we have more control when such events happen (yes, on the price of handling
our own IT).

Thank you all,

 - Yoav.


On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Marcel Manz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would suggest that Google splits the current availability percentage in
> the system status into two values.
>
> One related to applications using MS, the other related to applications
> using HR. A single value for the hole system somehow doesn't make sense, as
> this number won't be accurate to anyone, since no application can use MS
> and HR datastore at the same time.
>
> One could now argue that it further should need to be split according the
> language that is been used (Java, Python, Go). I'm sure the Googlers find a
> way to better present an accurate number for certain application groups.
>
> People who are using HR would like to see an over-all system status
> related to the HR datastore and not a much lower number just because MS
> apps are taking this value down. If the MS value is separately displayed,
> it should also motivate more people to migrate to HR.
>
> Marcel
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/k3J3OowyrUcJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>



-- 
 - Yoav

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to