Edge Cache is Infinite :-) So if you know how long a page is good for, and you can do things via Get Requests it is the way to go.
I'm guessing Jeff Probst's site could get to 70% cache hits or better easily. 100-ish objects I could probably load the whole site in to ram and not have a tiered system, and could serve everything from 1 or 2 instances, but that'd be code for a single site with atypical usage and not enough billing to support it. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Hoffman Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 1:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [google-appengine] MemCache Vs. EdgeCache Hi Brandon memcache effectiveness is going to be heavily dependent on what you are caching. I have in the past had memcache up to 70MB (but I haven't looked at it in a while.) One of my sites has a 76% hit ratio on memcache, but it only uses <7MB and the app has a small data set. I should use edge cache as well ;-) Cheers T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/r6ytOqg9yPoJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
