On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:27 PM, James X Nelson <[email protected]>wrote:
> I definitely, absolutely love the idea of having appengine internally
> route foo.com/api to api.foo.appspot.com. An under-the-covers targeting
> of different apps/versions is the only way I can think of to get ssl for
> the whole app without having to deal with how browsers handle the *.
> appspot.com certificate. Plus, being able to configure different
> instance configs with high or low latency would take advantage of smart
> clients that actually know which requests _should_ take a certain amount of
> time {before pre-warming requests, I had every gwt rpc log it's average run
> time in a format I compiled in to set a "you should be done by now" timer
> at 2x expected latency, so I could kill to old request and fire off a retry
> without waiting 10 seconds for the request to die}.
Great, we're pretty excited about the concepts as well.
>
> Anyway, the extra perks of shared memcache would be nice, but I would be
> more than absolutely happy to use it with nothing more than a single shared
> datastore namespace to serve as inter-app-swap space. Being able to remote
> api data over _would_ work, but paying for http + instance hours when all
> we need is entity get() -> entity put() makes it far less than desirable.
>
Re: Memcache -- rather than shared Memcache, I more frequently hear the
request for configurable Memcache instances (i.e. please reserve 2GB of
Memcache for app X). Does this resonate with what other folks are
experiencing?
Re: remote api data -- integrating at the data layer has the added
advantage of speed and cleanliness of code.
>
>
> I think, for standard users, they would have to pay flat billing for all
> app versions as if they were the same app. Premium accounts already pay
> $500/month and can just hook up multiple apps however they please, and just
> pay for usage.
>
Still being fleshed out, but rolled-up pricing seems to be a natural fit.
>
> Please keep us updated, I'm very excited about the potential to wire up
> multiple apps, especially if I can send requests to sub-apps / sub-versions
> under a single ssl-friendly subdomain. =}
>
Sure thing, and thanks for the feedback. Keep it coming!
-- Chris
>
>
--
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/s4ZqgSpVPRoJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
