The cost is the biggest negative. The way reads and writes are counted. 20 to 30 writes for entities with modest indexing. Fields cannot be searched without being indexed and compound indexes are frequently needed just to return results in ordered. Deletes are likewise expensive. Why they have to charge this way with instance charging, database storage usage, and bandwidth usage is ridiculous. Keeping costs low enough to continue with gae is a gigantic effort.
On Dec 28, 5:49 pm, Mauricio Aristizabal <[email protected]> wrote: > Absolutely! > > My only one concern has always been lock-in. But I've recently learned of > AppScalehttp://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu/so it seems if Google ever drops the > ball or starts milking us too hard, we'll have an easy migration path. > > With that, I now would recommend GAE 100% -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
