Victor,

Your example is a bit abstract, but a general test (e.g., see this code
snippet - http://pastebin.com/u6RHWqe6 ) works fine.  You might double
check that your instances do have the intended content prior to persisting
them.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Victor Emanuel <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I have a class:
>
>    @PersistenceCapable
>    public class X{
>        @Persistent
>        @Order(extensions = @Extension(vendorName = "datanucleus", key
> = "list-ordering", value = "date desc"))
>        private List<Race> list;
>
>        @Persistent
>        private Float value;
>    }
>
> When I try to make:
>
>    PersistenceManager pm = PMF.get().getPersistenceManager();
>    try {
>        X x = pm.getObjectById(X.class, id);
>        x.setValue(listObject.getValue().floatValue());
>        x.getList().add(listObject);
>    } finally {
>        pm.close();
>    }
>
> I'm expecting that in my X object I will add a listValue and set the
> value of 'value'. But the result is only adding the value in the list,
> ignoring the setting of ghe value!
>
> Is there anything wrong?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to