I'm done with Google App Engine. This problem has been going on for the past few weeks, with no adequate response/solution.
2012-02-07 03:30:18.825 /url/M 200 2195ms 16kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:30:14.984 /url/B 200 3274ms 17kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:30:09.744 /url 200 2808ms 9kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:30:02.627 /url 200 9419ms 8kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:29:50.751 / 200 1042ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:29:41.464 /url 200 5087ms 8kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:29:17.693 / 200 2448ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:28:45.551 /url?searchText=crawford 200 2867ms 2kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:28:35.916 /url 200 8532ms 8kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:28:24.929 / 200 1195ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:28:08.998 /url 200 9398ms 8kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 2012-02-07 03:27:57.539 / 200 1709ms 3kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46 Safari/535.11 On Feb 7, 1:55 am, "Brandon Wirtz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did you factor into account app startup times? Some apps can easily take > > several seconds to get fired up, so they do better with a larger buffer. > For > > light apps I agree, I've found 1 or 2 is sufficient. > > Yeah, I said warm-up not startup, but same thing. > > I like lower numbers too, but if your max latency is at 1/3 your average you > will pretty much be guaranteed to have an instance per simultaneous request. > My average request is 300ish MS so I can pull off 500-600ms, but someone > with 2.5s average would spin up a lot of extra instances everytime a user > hit a page making 8 requests. And you'd eat the start up time on all those > instances, so too low of a Max can make things worse. Again check the > archive I talked about this too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
