In all fairness, http sessions are generally considered a bad idea these
days.  Especially if you have scalability requirements.

Jeff

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Mos <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think you don't understand the point.  Spring isn't build for another
> platform. It's build as a core Java framework and is also supported for GAE
> applications.
> Our application is new and 100% build and optimized for GAE.
>
> By the way:  Some times your "humble" signature seems to have more
> substance than the content you write on this list. ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Brandon Wirtz <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Just so I’m clear.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> You used a frame work built for another platform. Wedged it in to this
>> platform. It is inefficient because it thinks it needs to re-validate
>> sessions faster than a page would load, which creates a boat load of
>> unnecessary requests.
>>
>> You acknowledge all of that.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> And then you still complain about GAE’s service and support?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It would appear that the failing of GAE is that they don’t put huge
>> disclaimers at the top of every documentation page saying “If you just copy
>> and paste code from old Python and Java applications your shit will break
>> so don’t frakking do it.”   Then when people complain in the forums we
>> could say RTFM and be done with it.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *Brandon Wirtz
>> *BlackWaterOps: President / Lead Mercenary ****
>>
>> [image: Description:
>> http://www.linkedin.com/img/signature/bg_slate_385x42.jpg]****
>>
>> *Work:* 510-992-6548
>> *Toll Free:* 866-400-4536 ****
>>
>> *IM:* [email protected] (Google Talk)
>> *Skype:* drakegreene
>> *YouTube:* BlackWaterOpsDotCom<http://www.youtube.com/blackwateropsdotcom>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> BlackWater Ops <http://www.blackwaterops.com/>
>>
>> Cloud On A String Mastermind Group <http://www.cloudonastring.com/>*
>>
>> *****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mos
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2012 7:56 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [google-appengine] Inefficient Session Implementation on
>> Google App Engine / Java & GAE Critics****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Wrote an article on my blog about this:
>> http://www.mosbase.com/2012/04/inefficient-session-implementation-on.html
>>
>> There is also a ticket. Please vote for it if you are affected as well:
>> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7355
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mos****
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

<<image003.jpg>>

Reply via email to