I hate to sound like the cloudflare shill, but why not use them as a frontend cache? One of their touted features is aggressive gzipping of content.
Jeff On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Emanuele Ziglioli <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Of course, if anyone has any advice on making gzip work, I'd be happy to >> hear it. =) >> > > Hi! > > I've been fighting with the same > issue: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/hv7QOd0ZlKM > I use 256MB instances in Java so haven't run into out of heap errors yet > while serving entities (I think they're around 10MB max at this stage). > So far I've been storing them using gz and had to decompress them in memory > before the google frontend servers could serve them gzipped. > Now I've switched to the blobstore in order to avoid that but I've > discovered that gzip doesnt work, probably just above 1MB. > So I'm back to having to load the blob in memory (that should work...) but > it costs in terms of CPU time, memory requirements, delays... > > Emanuele > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tMjK8vq42w8J. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
