If the processing is considered "offline" and not latency sensitive, then 
you can put that work onto a task queue and take up to 10 minutes. No need 
for a backend.

As for SciPy, Brandon is exactly right. SciPy is written entirely in 
Fortran whereas the other third-party libraries we have (NumPy, PIL, lxml) 
are written in C. For NLTK, do you really need SciPy? According to 
nltk.org, only NumPy is a dependency (optional).

On Monday, 23 July 2012 09:33:35 UTC+10, Hans Then wrote:
>
> Ah. That is very good news. We have no real timing requirements. I think 
> we will setup a backend instance for long running requests, to get around 
> the 60s limit.
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think we have everything you need.  We are working on some speed 
>> improvements because unfortunately the 60s limit doesn’t let you work with 
>> very big documents.
>>
>> Do you know how many words at a time you need to put through?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Hans Then
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 22, 2012 3:51 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: numpy and scipy question****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I am mainly using the classify and the cluster packages.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks for considering this to be included.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hans 
>>
>> Op zondag 22 juli 2012 19:18:25 UTC+2 schreef Brandon Wirtz het volgende:
>> ****
>>
>> I am building an API that does much of what NLTK does.  Which parts are 
>> you looking to use? Likely making API calls to my optimized version would 
>> cost less than actually running the full version, (which includes a lot of 
>> things that won’t work on GAE  (like the cool drawing of the sentence 
>> diagram)
>>
>> If the parts you need don’t take too much effort to add, I’ll put them on 
>> my teams task list for the API release in 2 weeks.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> -Brandon****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Hans Then
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 22, 2012 7:04 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: numpy and scipy question****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> The application I develop uses libraries such as gensim and NLTK, which 
>> depend on SciPy. Currently my plan is to run it on Heroku, but I would much 
>> prefer to use appengine.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Hans****
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Drake <[email protected]> wrote:****
>>
>> I don’t know then. I thought NumPy was all C… 
>>
>> Any how I use Numpy but not SciPy. Apparently Google caters to my every 
>> whim and so they gave me what I needed.  J
>>
>> Depending what you need Matrix.py, and Euclid.py get you many of the most 
>> common things you would use Numpy and Scipy for.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Hans Then
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:34 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: numpy and scipy question****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> NumPy is also Fortran. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> But my confusion is that if SciPy will not be supported, then why support 
>> NumPy? NumPy and SciPy are hardly ever used separately.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> Op zondag 22 juli 2012 09:11:00 UTC+2 schreef Brandon Wirtz het volgende:
>> ****
>>
>> SciPy is mostly in Fortran. So I don’t give you good odds.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Hans Then
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 22, 2012 12:05 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [google-appengine] Re: numpy and scipy question****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Hi Anand,****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Are there plans to also support SciPy in the future?****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Hans Then
>>
>> Op woensdag 25 januari 2012 00:34:53 UTC+1 schreef Anand Mistry het 
>> volgende:****
>>
>> NumPy is available on the Python 2.7 runtime, but SciPy is not.****
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/-WRRRE6BhD8J.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/iM54xnkAilIJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ESn4rOHx3a8J.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.****
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_qqxzAOHs40J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to