Hi Carl, Can you let me know your app-id?
Regards, Saket On Thursday, 27 December 2012 20:01:30 UTC+1, Carl Schroeder wrote: > > I am still seeing java instances decomissioned after sub minute quiet > periods. Given that it takes 20-30 seconds to spin one java instance up, > you should probably leave them alive for a bit longer than a few seconds. > Otherwise, for low traffic profiles, page loads for GAE java can take up to > 30 seconds. God help us if the scheduler thinks I need 2 new instances spun > up in series rather than parallel. > > FYI, people don't wait around for a minute for pages to load. They use > other services. > > Once again, due to unannounced pathological behavior of the instancing on > GAE, we are wasting our time re-implementing our java infrastructure on > AWS. At least, I hope it is a waste of our time... > > > On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 4:00:26 PM UTC-8, Francois Masurel wrote: >> >> Hi Saket, >> >> Thanx for investigating the problem. >> >> Things seems to have improved significantly these last few days. >> >> On our Neustar reports, for an average page loading, we can see that we >> went from >> 6.65s<https://monitor.wpm.neustar.biz/reports/graph_log/#/?monitorIds=8bc3b100-b372-11e1-a749-9848e1660ab3&timeRange=last_24_hours&functionType=loadtime&graphType=line_chart&view=loadtime> >> (12/16) >> to 8.94s (12/18) and back to >> 2.57s<https://monitor.wpm.neustar.biz/reports/graph_log/#/?monitorIds=8bc3b100-b372-11e1-a749-9848e1660ab3&timeRange=last_24_hours&functionType=loadtime&graphType=line_chart&view=loadtime> >> (12/23). >> >> I can confirm that we don't see as much instance warm ups in our logs as >> we were used before, we went from every 3-4 minutes to 20-25 minutes. >> >> I definitely think things have changed on Google side as we haven't >> changed anything on our side. >> >> But some strange things are still going on at the moment (12/26 0:52 >> UTC+1) as a dynamic instance has been up for more than 4 hours but has >> served only one request (cf. screenshot below). >> >> Thanx again Saket for your help. >> >> François >> >> >> <https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ARDAA2Yu-NY/UNo-Bgn9SpI/AAAAAAAAyN8/NNC4QLzi93g/s1600/Instances+-+VinoCities+-+Google+Chrome.jpg> >> >> >> >> >> On Monday, December 24, 2012 11:54:48 PM UTC+1, Saket Kumar wrote: >>> >>> Hi Francois, >>> >>> Are you still facing this issue? I did a small test for your application >>> and didn't find anything too bad from scheduler's perspective. I'm trying >>> to understand if it was a temporary glitch that was causing the issue or >>> something is wrong with scheduler's algorithm. Or if scheduler doesn't spin >>> instances properly if QPS is low. >>> >>> Here is series of events- >>> >>> a.) Single resident was serving for 1 day, 03:26:37 minutes, serving >>> 9600 request >>> b.) After serving 96 requests with raised QPS, new instance was created. >>> c.) QPS lowered and the new instance was allowed to die. >>> d.) Again the QPS was increased and new instance was created. Both >>> instances were handling requests at this point. >>> e.) QPS lowered again, newly formed instance dies and older instance >>> starts serving 100% of the requests. >>> >>> - >>> Saket >>> >>> On Saturday, 22 December 2012 12:18:00 UTC+1, Francois Masurel wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Christina, >>>> >>>> For my personal case, my production app-id is "vncts1" with billing >>>> enabled. >>>> >>>> And the related issue is : >>>> https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7865 >>>> >>>> As I said at the beginning of this thread, there are quite a few other >>>> threads related to this problem : >>>> >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-appengine/cJcOrOE4JDc/uKFBbylFOxIJ >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/8KiXRP-oU5I/Jf5kzcvyIiwJ >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/NR_oV4znvks/KtkSmVQD2IgJ >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/_znmrJwFMuM/V2epYOQ19L4J >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/hg3BH8WOGWA/discussion >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/UN5oCWkPsaA/discussion >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/RneC9qDbeRE/discussion >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/sLZcZoK-A3Y/discussion >>>> >>>> Thanx for you help. >>>> >>>> François >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Saturday, December 22, 2012 3:15:05 AM UTC+1, Christina Ilvento >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind sending app-ids that you're seeing this behavior for? >>>>> Please feel free to send them to me directly or to link any issues you >>>>> have >>>>> filed in our issue tracker so that we can investigate. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Christina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Carl Schroeder <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've been sacrificing unicorns to dark powers...clearly I have been >>>>>> doing it wrong. >>>>>> That probably explains some unusual behavior in other parts of my app. >>>>>> AFK pentagrams. :( >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:51:35 PM UTC-8, Cesium wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ready for this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, a single instance survives for hours and hours, happily serving >>>>>>> requests with the usual low latency response time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is just what Sir Brandon wrote about. Mysterious changes in the >>>>>>> system's behavior. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I should note that I sprinkled rainbow Skittles across the floor to >>>>>>> attract the unicorns. They're back! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> David >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Google App Engine" group. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/MFdFH0ZqWbgJ. >>>>>> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Christina Ilvento | Google App Engine | [email protected] | >>>>> (650)-201-9399 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/KeuHCBwjknkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
