Yes it does. Unfortunately, I don't have the bandwidth currently to port our production system to an experimental service. At this time, I need to get the GAE features (load balancing & A/B testing) in our production services running with sub 10 second response times.
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 12:24:08 AM UTC-8, alex wrote: > > Carl, your case seems to be fitting nicely with the new Servers feature: > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Chris Ramsdale > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > We're excited to announce a new App Engine feature called "Servers" that > > allow developers to segment large-scale applications into logical > components > > that are able to share stateful services and communicate in a secure > > fashion. For example, applications that have multiple frontends which > > handle web-based and mobile-based traffic or applications that have > various > > backends for data analysis, billing pipelines, etc. > > > > Part of building great products is gathering quality user feedback early > on. > > If you're interested, we encourage you to sign-up using the following > form. > > Based on input we'll select a small group of trusted testers. > > > > > https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/forms/d/1qjuLxnAHQeq2YQMCMAITbC6St_NrfzHDxrbkuTqvmfY/viewform > > > > > Cheers! > > > > Chris Ramsdale > > Product Manager, Google App Engine > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Carl Schroeder > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > Unfortunately, the contents of the datastore drives our user experience > > completely. Unless the 2 apps shared a datastore view, it would have > limited > > value to us. > > > > This bug also sinks the ability to do A/B testing. Since the B group > would > > be using a non-default app version, their experience will be degraded to > the > > point where they would hate anything put in front of them. > > > > A duplicate app ID can be used to do limited QA testing, but it would > not > > have access to our user's data collections, thus not be appropriate for > A/B > > or Beta testing. > > > > > > On Friday, January 11, 2013 12:33:10 PM UTC-8, Kristopher Giesing wrote: > >> > >> I set up a duplicate app ID for beta testing. Would that work for you? > >> > >> - Kris > >> > >> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:33:21 PM UTC-8, Carl Schroeder wrote: > >>> > >>> We still have this bug in spades. > >>> > >>> We can no longer give access to beta java versions (they are > non-default) > >>> because they are unusable in low traffic scenarios. This stings the > most, > >>> since our users can no longer critique any versions except the > "default" > >>> one. > >>> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/444KTGNdV44J. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javascript:>. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/qPF54uwkTlQJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
