The only way to get this to perform is to serialize the values into a string. Repeated properties are way too slow when you get to this number of repetitions. (They're good for tags, which need to be indexed, and of which youd expect there to be z few, or dozens, or occasionally hundreds.)
--Guido On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Ryan Chazen <[email protected]> wrote: > Depends if those integers are indexed or not. Each index is a write op. > However, an entity can only be 1mb big.. I think 1 million integers would > be more than 1mb as appengine stores natively as strings... > > What you could try is to store the integers in multiple entities (say > 1-1000 integers per entity). That would make adding new integers easy as > you would not need to modify old entities. You could join all the integers > back together if needed with a query. > > > On Friday, January 25, 2013 8:32:48 PM UTC+2, Jiansen He wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Say an entity has a list property which has 1 million integers. Now we >> need to update the list property by adding 1 more integer. Does updating >> via put cost 2 million write operations? If so, is there a cheap >> alternative? >> >> With Thanks >> Jiansen >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
