With the kind of issues AppEngine has - high prices, random bad performance, limited features (no sockets, etc), no support, java instance startup times, routing new requests to instances that haven't started yet, incredibly small VMs - I think the humour is probably on Google's side also. AppEngine must be a big joke to someone there!
On Friday, February 15, 2013 7:13:10 AM UTC+2, Sam wrote: > > Couldn't agree more with the humour part. > But seriously, there's real need for reasonably priced (actual) high > memory instances. > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:17 AM, pdknsk <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote: > >> > High Memory Instances >> >> :) >> >> That's some humor right there. >> >> http://cloud.google.com/pricing/compute-engine >> >> "High Memory" >> >> 13 GB >> ... >> 52 GB >> >> http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ >> >> "High-Memory Instance" >> >> 17.1 GB >> ... >> 64.8 GB >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
