I have found push task queues very reliable and use them all the time. PK http://www.gae123.com
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 7:29 AM, Kaan Soral <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for sharing retrying, indeed it's pretty interesting > > My situation is pretty unique, that's why there are usually 3 consecutive > requests in the worst case and at most 5-6, that's why an architecture change > is an overkill > > I had a lot of experience with both push queue and pull queue based solutions > in the past, and I can safely say that, "better let them content" > > In my opinion, both pull queues and push queues are extremely unreliable, so > on this project, I made it so that the occasional contention is safe to occur > > However, I hoped with retries=6 the transactions would untangle them on their > own, but they don't > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/64683751-e390-4f16-ad0c-ec4a94246256%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/3E746858-41A0-4B9E-82EC-DF4E9D6C47EE%40gae123.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
