You're right, I was in error on the calendar, but am definitely using
to query and change spreadsheet cell data, create entire sheets in a
workbook and also Docs listings, creating collections, uploading
documents (with resumable upload).  The most important thing to me is
what is the future of 2LO for administratively managing such
requirements?
Bob

On May 27, 7:26 pm, Sandip Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I have been monitoring the forums closely, and no one can get even a the
> Calendar API to work with Service Accounts (2LO in OAuth 2.0 world).
>
> Do you mind posting some sample code?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sandip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, bobpuffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ACL lists on all of the documents apis (Sites, Spreadsheets, Docs,
> > Calendars).  Docs listing.  Almost anything including querying and
> > updating cells in spreadsheets.  Some spreadsheet functions fail
> > because the redirect goes to a location that only accepts Clientlogin.
> > I'm pretty confused between my experience and your statements.  Most
> > of all I'd be interested in knowing the near and distant future of
> > being able to support 2-legged OAuth because its critical and if its
> > going away, we have to align ourselves with a service that can meet
> > our repository needs using administrative control without user
> > intervention.
> > Bob
>
> > On May 26, 12:53 pm, Sandip Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Correction - it does not support the Google Apps APIs.
>
> > > Sandip
>
> > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:28:17 AM UTC-7, Sandip Shah wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Bob,
>
> > > > OAuth 2.0 does not support 2-legged anywhere afaik.
>
> > > > Which APIs are you using it with?
>
> > > > Sandip
>
> > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 7:30:30 AM UTC-7, bobpuffer wrote:
>
> > > >> Is it just that OAuth 2.0 doesn't support 2-legged for the
> > > >> provisioning?  I'm using OAuth 2.0 2-legged all over the place except
> > > >> the provisioning.
> > > >> Thanks
>
> > > >> On May 25, 7:25 pm, Claudio Cherubino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Bob,
>
> > > >> > OAuth 2.0 doesn't support the 2-legged flow.
> > > >> > If you use 2-legged OAuth 1.0 with the Provisioning API you don't
> > have
> > > >> to
> > > >> > specify the xoauth_requestor_id parameter.
>
> > > >> > Claudio
>
> > > >> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:24 PM, bobpuffer <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > So... in order to programmatically provision user accounts using
> > > >> 2-legged
> > > >> > > OAuth 2.0 would the xoauth_requestor_id be the email of an admin
> > > >> capable of
> > > >> > > creating new accounts?  I'm getting invalid header returns.
>
> > > >> > >  --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > > "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
> > > >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
>
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-apps-mgmt-apis/-/uBM2KVOuStkJ.
>
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.
>
> > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:28:17 AM UTC-7, Sandip Shah wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Bob,
>
> > > > OAuth 2.0 does not support 2-legged anywhere afaik.
>
> > > > Which APIs are you using it with?
>
> > > > Sandip
>
> > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 7:30:30 AM UTC-7, bobpuffer wrote:
>
> > > >> Is it just that OAuth 2.0 doesn't support 2-legged for the
> > > >> provisioning?  I'm using OAuth 2.0 2-legged all over the place except
> > > >> the provisioning.
> > > >> Thanks
>
> > > >> On May 25, 7:25 pm, Claudio Cherubino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Bob,
>
> > > >> > OAuth 2.0 doesn't support the 2-legged flow.
> > > >> > If you use 2-legged OAuth 1.0 with the Provisioning API you don't
> > have
> > > >> to
> > > >> > specify the xoauth_requestor_id parameter.
>
> > > >> > Claudio
>
> > > >> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:24 PM, bobpuffer <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > So... in order to programmatically provision user accounts using
> > > >> 2-legged
> > > >> > > OAuth 2.0 would the xoauth_requestor_id be the email of an admin
> > > >> capable of
> > > >> > > creating new accounts?  I'm getting invalid header returns.
>
> > > >> > >  --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > > "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
> > > >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
>
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-apps-mgmt-apis/-/uBM2KVOuStkJ.
>
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.
>
> > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:28:17 AM UTC-7, Sandip Shah wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Bob,
>
> > > > OAuth 2.0 does not support 2-legged anywhere afaik.
>
> > > > Which APIs are you using it with?
>
> > > > Sandip
>
> > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 7:30:30 AM UTC-7, bobpuffer wrote:
>
> > > >> Is it just that OAuth 2.0 doesn't support 2-legged for the
> > > >> provisioning?  I'm using OAuth 2.0 2-legged all over the place except
> > > >> the provisioning.
> > > >> Thanks
>
> > > >> On May 25, 7:25 pm, Claudio Cherubino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Bob,
>
> > > >> > OAuth 2.0 doesn't support the 2-legged flow.
> > > >> > If you use 2-legged OAuth 1.0 with the Provisioning API you don't
> > have
> > > >> to
> > > >> > specify the xoauth_requestor_id parameter.
>
> > > >> > Claudio
>
> > > >> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:24 PM, bobpuffer <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > So... in order to programmatically provision user accounts using
> > > >> 2-legged
> > > >> > > OAuth 2.0 would the xoauth_requestor_id be the email of an admin
> > > >> capable of
> > > >> > > creating new accounts?  I'm getting invalid header returns.
>
> > > >> > >  --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > > "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
> > > >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
>
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-apps-mgmt-apis/-/uBM2KVOuStkJ.
>
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.
>
> > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:28:17 AM UTC-7, Sandip Shah wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Bob,
>
> > > > OAuth 2.0 does not support 2-legged anywhere afaik.
>
> > > > Which APIs are you using it with?
>
> > > > Sandip
>
> > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 7:30:30 AM UTC-7, bobpuffer wrote:
>
> > > >> Is it just that OAuth 2.0 doesn't support 2-legged for the
> > > >> provisioning?  I'm using OAuth 2.0 2-legged all over the place except
> > > >> the provisioning.
> > > >> Thanks
>
> > > >> On May 25, 7:25 pm, Claudio Cherubino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Bob,
>
> > > >> > OAuth 2.0 doesn't support the 2-legged flow.
> > > >> > If you use 2-legged OAuth 1.0 with the Provisioning API you don't
> > have
> > > >> to
> > > >> > specify the xoauth_requestor_id parameter.
>
> > > >> > Claudio
>
> > > >> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:24 PM, bobpuffer <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > So... in order to programmatically provision user accounts using
> > > >> 2-legged
> > > >> > > OAuth 2.0 would the xoauth_requestor_id be the email of an admin
> > > >> capable of
> > > >> > > creating new accounts?  I'm getting invalid header returns.
>
> > > >> > >  --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > > "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
> > > >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
>
> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-apps-mgmt-apis/-/uBM2KVOuStkJ.
>
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > > [email protected].
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Apps Domain Information and Management APIs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-apps-mgmt-apis?hl=en.

Reply via email to