Celebird, You are exactly right that my approach could be optimized quite a bit. I'm hoping to do this load only once so I'm not too concerned about efficiency. I am concerned about running out of memory when the feed gets big so your approach would definitely be better.
-=beeky On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, Celebird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > getGoogleBaseFeedSize(feed) + getGoogleBaseEntrySize(gentry) > > seems prohibitively inefficient if generateAtom is > starting from the top of the feed after each entry. > > but especially if something like > gbfs += getGoogleBaseEntrySize(gentry) > might give the same similar results. > > i'm probably missing something obvious. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
