Thanks Tom. That one gets forwarded to the suits!
On Feb 9, 3:07 pm, Tom Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I doubt they'd even release even a basic list of how the disapproval
> system works or what it checks. The more detail they provide the more
> they open up the system to more abuse.
>
> The best you can do is manage whatever system your building to the
> best of your ability, and make sure you've got policies in place to
> cover yourself.
> You can't guarantee everything is going to go smoothly when it relies
> on Google and the policies of Google Base. I've been there and having
> an agreement in place and making sure both sides know how it works is
> important.
>
> Tom Wilson
> Freelance Google Base Developer and Consultantwww.tomthedeveloper.com
>
> Google Base Tools -http://dev.tomthedeveloper.com/googlebase
> Featured Project
> :http://google-code-featured.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-base-competit...
>
> On Feb 9, 5:10 pm, icebackhaz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I wasn't suggesting that there exists freely available software
> > (from google or otherwise) to do the verification. But I guess I
> > would like some thing a little more concrete from google about what is
> > tested and how. I'll happily write tests against that definition.
> > Call me lazy, but since one runs some risk of getting a client booted
> > out for certain types transgressions I think an explicit definition is
> > not asking too much. In the extreme cases, reacting (asynchronously)
> > to rejected items can be a case of closing the barn door after the
> > horses have left.
>
> > Thanks as always for your comments and clarifications.
>
> > On Feb 2, 9:01 pm, Celebird <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > there's no automated pre-verification
> > > software from google that i know about.
>
> > > there's no api or similar solution for the
> > > disapproval definitions; but i believe there
> > > is enough explicit and implicit definitions
> > > in existing documentation to write fairly
> > > accurate and extensive safeguards --
> > > i've reached over 150 so far.
>
> > > the key word is *should* happen fairly quickly --
> > > there may be only a few attributes that are both
> > > defined as causing disapproval and offer recovery;
> > > this is probably as purposeful as the police not
> > > issuing warnings at every traffic violation.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Base Data API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
