http://codereview.appspot.com/11948/diff/402/403 File doc/html/compiledModuleFormat/index.html (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/11948/diff/402/403#newcode207 Line 207: it will be bit-identical to the original source <em>when parsed as a On 2009/02/02 20:52:21, felix8a wrote:
"bit-identical" seems wrong since js strings are defined as utf-16
while much of
the web is encoded as utf-8. maybe "char-identical"?
Java and python are both UTF-16 and most UTF-8 text out there is really a UTF-8 encoding of UTF-16 code-units, so there seems to be an emerging consensus around UTF-16 at some level. Maybe "UTF-16 code-unit identical" would be ideal. I dislike the use of file names since those are platform specific. http://codereview.appspot.com/11948
