On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Mark S. Miller<[email protected]> wrote: > > cajita.js has not been and should not become dependent on the browser as > a > > hosting context. It should be just as applicable to using Caja on the > server > > side. ... > > That's a good point; thanks for clarifying. > > Looking forward to your remarks on the remainder. Specifically: I have > no sentimental attachment to my proposal as is ;) -- but I think we > need a (possibly optional) hook, in the guff returned from the > cajoling service, for *some* kind of JSONP magic *somewhere*. >
Back to absorbing. No substantive comments yet. But another nag to go along with my previous: while I love Tyler's ref_send library, *please* do not splice it into cajita.js. It does not belong there and it should be cajoled. Is there a reason to run this uncajoled? -- Cheers, --MarkM
