But "ant runtests" fails differently, and I don't know how to diagnose
it.
https://codereview.appspot.com/10075043/diff/2001/src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js
File src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10075043/diff/2001/src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js#newcode3901
src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js:3901: * reactions to tests and
repairs. Off for now because this is
On 2013/06/08 00:23:16, kpreid2 wrote:
On 2013/06/07 02:57:23, MarkM wrote:
> If SES were always run with source mitigations available, that would
be ok.
> But when SES is run standalone without source mitigations, that
change of
> setting would fail unsafe.
Agreed.
> I don't think I yet understand why I wouldn't be able to use your
current CL
> to express this. I'll hold off until you submit that one and then
see what
> happens when I try.
r5442 is in.
Done. But differently than expected. Please take a careful look.
https://codereview.appspot.com/10075043/diff/2001/src/com/google/caja/ses/whitelist.js
File src/com/google/caja/ses/whitelist.js (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10075043/diff/2001/src/com/google/caja/ses/whitelist.js#newcode75
src/com/google/caja/ses/whitelist.js:75: * can retire all "skip" entries
by the time SES is ready for secure
On 2013/06/06 16:41:43, kpreid2 wrote:
There are no longer any 'skip' entries. Should we retire the skip
mechanism
itself, now? If not, should these comments be lightly updated?
Done. Retired.
https://codereview.appspot.com/10075043/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
