Comment #3 on issue 1444 by [email protected]: Making WeakMap security not
depending on HIDDEN_NAME being neither unguessable nor undiscoverable
http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/issues/detail?id=1444
The other potential flaw it has is that it may be prohibitively expensive,
given how intensely SES uses its own WeakMaps. I don't know that it is, but
I just want to remind us that we need to test this before deciding to make
this change.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
