On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013/09/04 01:00:18, MarkM wrote: > >> LGTM. >> > > Should this module still be called "ejectorsGuardsTrademarks"? >> > > MarkM, I am surprised you approve of reducing the “standard > library” features of SES in this way. I like the functionality of ejectors, but I am uncomfortable with the implications of doing this as a library rather than directly in the language, due to the unavoidable interactions with throw/try/catch/finally. Hiding this now, before customers rely on it, is still easy. If we decide we wish to expose it again later, that would also be easy. > > > https://codereview.appspot.**com/13343047/<https://codereview.appspot.com/13343047/> > > -- > > ---You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to > google-caja-discuss+**[email protected]<google-caja-discuss%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit > https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> > . > -- Cheers, --MarkM -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
