On 2014/01/07 21:19:30, kpreid_google wrote:
On 2014/01/07 20:42:59, felix8a wrote:
> Sorry, this fell out of my inbox. Is this a problem you've run into?
The
visual
> output seems quite easy to see when I run it. This size is large
enough to see
> about a dozen test divs at a time.
It's not really the specific size of the viewport that's at issue —
it's that we
have an existing mechanism to handle the problem of the content
needing to be a
certain amount larger than the viewport, and the mechanism is that <p>
that I
pointed out; thus that's what should be tweaked, not the viewport
size.
But I do also have memories of debugging these tests being annoying
due to the
viewport size — I don't recall the exact scenario.
Making the <p> larger seems like a worse option to me. How do I know how
large the <p> should be, maybe 10000px is enough? Will a relative size
like 200% be based off the right measurement? And larger content also
makes it harder to view the results, since now I have to scroll an
arbitrary distance to see the next result.
https://codereview.appspot.com/40370044/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
