Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: [email protected]
Comment #2 on issue 1898 by [email protected]: pathname property of anchor
elements is missing
http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/issues/detail?id=1898
That taming would cause .pathname to reflect an _attribute_
named 'pathname', which is meaningless to HTML and doesn't pass your
original test case. If it were PT.filterProp instead then it would be a
hole in the URI policy.
Does Angular need .pathname to read back what is written, or just to be a
string rather than undefined? This will affect whether we need to implement
preserving URIs rewritten by the URI policy.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
