Le 17/03/2017 à 03:57, 'Mark S. Miller' via Google Caja Discuss a écrit :
[+lots]
The current plan is for Realms
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-realms/ to provide those hooks. The
precise nature of these hooks has not yet settled down.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Mike Stay <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Given the question in the title is asked on the Caja mailing-list, I
assume the question is asked specifically about the JavaScript that can
be found on the web.
And the answer is no.
The ECMAScript spec defines the syntax, but leaves the loading semantics
off of the ECMAScript spec itself.
To the best of my knowledge, the latest state of web browser agreement
regarding how a browser will load a module is defined at
https://whatwg.github.io/loader/ (but only implemented behind flags in
browsers).
Even if the spec is still in flux, I doubt browsers will ever give
access to the file system directly, so no worries there.
Then there is the question of the loading semantics of "import" in the
Node.js runtime. That's a different story, with complicated ramifications.
I think the latest news on that front can be read at :
https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/an-update-on-es6-modules-in-node-js-42c958b890c
Also, follow https://twitter.com/nodemjs and https://twitter.com/jasnell
for news about this.
In any case, in Node, the loader will most certainly give ambiant
authority to the file system, but that's not more than what the current
loader ("require" function of CommonJS modules) provides.
Or is there some way to configure/intercept resolution of modules?
As MarkM mentionned, there are plans to be hooks to intercept resolution
of modules. These obviously won't increase authority on the web, but may
help decreasing authority for the Node.js loader (which I'm looking
forward to).
Hope that helps,
David
--
Mike Stay - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/%7Emike>
http://reperiendi.wordpress.com <http://reperiendi.wordpress.com>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:google-caja-discuss%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
