No, no proxies here. "No latency"? At all? So there's one big authoritative database back there with no caching or replication? That's one big caribou. Scary.
-c On Feb 12, 4:54 pm, "Ryan Boyd (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > Thanks for the report. Based on how the system is architected, there should > be no such latency. Are you going through any proxy servers or using any > HTTP libs which may be caching your feed results? > > Thanks for the hint in the PS :) > > Cheers, > > -Ryan > > On 2/12/07, Charlie Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We're seeing some behavior that we suspect is due to latency between > > when an event is created (and timestamped) and when it first show up > > in its calendar's feed. Our suspicion is supported by the fact that > > we're seeing this behavior mostly with non-US users. > > > So my question is, is such latency possible, and if so, how much? Is > > there a reasonable upper bound (i.e., Do 99.999% of events created > > show up in their calendar's feed within 10 seconds of their <updated> > > time? 120 seconds? ) We can easily adjust the updated-min parameter of > > our query, but the bigger I make the window the more duplicate > > information we have to process. > > > Thanks, > > Charlie > > > PS. Are you guys working on making GCal available offline with Firefox > > 3? :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Calendar Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
