Does this mean, that instead of exdate's being in the gd:recurrence tag, I will get an extra event that has gd:originalEvent set, even if I have singleevents=false (which is the default)? That dosen't seem right. If you take EXDATE's out of the gd:recurrence, then they should be added as gd:recurrenceExceptions but not as an extra event.
Philipp On Mar 21, 12:36 am, "Ryan Boyd (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is just a heads up that EXDATE syntax will no longer appear in > gd:recurrence elements sometime in the near future (several weeks > out). Deleted instances of recurring events will once again appear in > the feeds. You may have noticed this in some of the other threads, > but I wanted to point this out to avoid any surprises. > > EXDATE icalendar syntax was added in the last release, but ended up > causing problems for some clients which do not support that syntax. > > Happy coding, > > -Ryan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Calendar Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
