No problem David.  Let us know if this problem occurs again.

Cheers,
-Ryan

On Apr 6, 12:55 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> No problem today,
> I don't understand ....
> Perhaps, I was tired ....
>
> Sorry.
>
> David.
>
> On Apr 5, 11:42 pm, "Ryan Boyd (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
>
> > I tried recreating this problem, but was unable to do so.  I followed
> > your instructions (using the same dates), and I always got a
> > gd:reccurrenceException element for each entry I deleted.
>
> > Is there possibly a proxy server caching copies of the feeds?  Can you
> > verify that the 'updated' (child of 'feed) date has changed when you
> > delete an instance?   Also, try doing a query against the full
> > projection with a query parameter singleevents=true-- to see if that
> > includes only the entries that should still exist, or also the deleted
> > entries?  You <em>should</em> see one <entry> for each instance of the
> > recurring event.  Each entry should contain 1 <gd:when> element.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > -Ryan
>
> > On Apr 5, 2:03 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok to get gd:recurrenceException
> > > It's more usable than EXDATE....
>
> > > But retrieving the composite projection feed return the same
> > > exceptions.
> > > The last deleted single ocurrency is missing too.
>
> > > David.
>
> > > On Apr 5, 9:47 pm, "Ryan Boyd (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hello David,
>
> > > > Try retrieving the composite projection feed [1] to see
> > > > gd:recurrenceException elements.  These should contain the canceled
> > > > instances.
>
> > > > Sorry the EXDATE elements aren't appearing correctly.  The EXDATE
> > > > elements are being deprecated in the full feed.  Deleted instances of
> > > > recurring events will once again appear as separate entry elements in
> > > > the full feed.  As Philipp has pointed out in the groups, they should
> > > > probably only be represented as gd:recurrenceException elements in the
> > > > composite feed and should not be represented in the full feed.  We are
> > > > taking his suggestion into consideration, but it will not occur with
> > > > the next release.
>
> > > > Please follow up here if you have any additional questions.
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > -Ryan
>
> > > > [1] -http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/reference.html#Projection
>
> > > > On Apr 5, 10:52 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > > The recurrent events returned by the API are not uptodate:
> > > > > The last deleted single occurency is always missing
>
> > > > > In google calendar (web UI), I create a recurrent event :
> > > > > from 10:00 to 11:00
> > > > > daily from 07/04/03 to 07/04/08
> > > > > so 6 days
>
> > > > > I delete a single occurrency in Google Calendar (web UI) (for example
> > > > > 07/04/04), a query on this event does not return any exception
> > > > > (EXDATE) for this deleted occurrency.
>
> > > > > I delete another single occurrency in Google Calendar (web UI) (for
> > > > > example 07/04/05), a query on this event returns only one exception
> > > > > (EXDATE) for this deleted occurrency.
> > > > > The EXDATE contains the first deleted occurrency (07/04/04), but not
> > > > > the last (07/04/05)
> > > > > I delete a third single occurrency in Google Calendar, EXDATE contains
> > > > > these exceptions : 07/04/04 and 07/04/05, but not the third.
> > > > > Etc.....
>
> > > > > I hope I'm understandable...
>
> > > > > I have the same problem with gdata-python-client-library,
> > > > > pygooglecalendar and calgoo (java UI)
>
> > > > > David.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Calendar Data API" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to