FWIW we're still seeing the problematic behavior. Regards, Charlie
On Oct 4, 11:04 am, Charlie Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lane, > > That's great news--thanks. We'll wait with bated breath to see the > fixed functionality. > > Regards, > Charlie > > On Oct 4, 12:20 pm, "Lane LiaBraaten (Google)" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Charlie, > > > I'm traveling so I don't have the details right now, but the issue has > > been fixed and Calendar should start working properly again very > > soon. > > > Cheers, > > -Lane > > > On Oct 4, 9:05 am,Charlie Wood<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Any update on > > this? We're still seeing this (very annoying) behavior. > > > > Thanks, > > > Charlie > > > > On Sep 10, 12:05 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > I am also experiencing the same issue but got no reply. > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi/browse_th... > > > > > The problem is that if you dont even change anything in an event (a > > > > simple event) and update it through the API, the event has a question > > > > mark and if i look at the event, a invitee is being added to it (Who > > > > collection) with the Calendar Name as the invitee. This is very > > > > annoying. > > > > > Kindly look at it ASAP. > > > > > Thanks > > > > Kulvinder Singh > > > > > On Sep 8, 1:38 pm, Hans Allis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Has anything changed already regarding this behaviour ? The problem > > > > > I'm experiencing is that, even when I'm just changing the value of an > > > > > extended property, my own (http://schemas.google.com/g/ > > > > > 2005#event.organizer) status gets changed back to "invited". I'm > > > > > updating non-reoccuring events without any additional attendees. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Hans Allis > > > > > > On Aug 9, 12:54 am, biotech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Lane, this approach sounds reasonable, I'm looking forward to > > > > > > thisupdate. > > > > > > > On a related note, how will non-google attendee statuses be handled? > > > > > > One feature that I and several other developers are looking for is > > > > > > the > > > > > > ability to change these responses programatically. In my instance, > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > syncing google calendar from our internal calendaring system and > > > > > > would > > > > > > like to sync response status. > > > > > > > Also, I'm using google calendar for my domain, and would really like > > > > > > the ability to change response status for google users if I'm > > > > > > authenticated using an administrator account. Most calendaring > > > > > > systems > > > > > > have an administrator option for this! > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 2:55 pm, "Lane LiaBraaten (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi biotech, > > > > > > > > The intended functionality is to reset the attendees status to > > > > > > > 'invited' if some significant change is made to an event. For > > > > > > > example, if I change the time of a meeting I may cause a > > > > > > > confilict for > > > > > > > one of the attendees that had previously accepted the invitation. > > > > > > > So > > > > > > > what is a 'significant' change? > > > > > > > > The current plan is toupdatethe current behavior and reset the > > > > > > > status to invited only when a change is made to the event time or > > > > > > > timezone, since this could cause scheduling conflicts. If the > > > > > > > title, > > > > > > > description, etc. are updated, the attendee status won't change. > > > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > > > -Lane > > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 9:55 am, biotech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > I just wanted to check in and see if there are any updates with > > > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 3:33 pm, "Lane LiaBraaten (Google)" > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hibiotech, et al. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for digging into this issue. The behavior doesn't > > > > > > > > > seem right > > > > > > > > > to me so I'll have to look into what is triggering the > > > > > > > > > attendee status > > > > > > > > > to be reset to invited - I'm guessing it's similar to the > > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > brought up here: > > > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi/browse_th... > > > > > > > > > > Have you noticed a difference between updates to single vs. > > > > > > > > > recurring > > > > > > > > > events? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the inconvenience - I hope to get you coding again > > > > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > -Lane > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 1:09 pm,biotech<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply, Ray. > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully this is something Google can correct soon (or > > > > > > > > > > come up with a > > > > > > > > > > workaround). As it stands, this is preventing me from going > > > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > further on my development. I can't reset everyone's > > > > > > > > > > response whenever > > > > > > > > > > I make a simple change to an event. > > > > > > > > > > > Furthermore, a lot of the events I'm dealing with will have > > > > > > > > > > external > > > > > > > > > > attendees. I also need to be able to modify their response > > > > > > > > > > via the > > > > > > > > > > API.http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=55816&topic=10365 > > > > > > > > > > suggests that I should be able to, but this is not working. > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps someone from Google can comment on this problem and > > > > > > > > > > status? > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > -Tim > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 12:57 pm, Ray Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >biotechwrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm able to consistently reproduce this behavior. > > > > > > > > > > > > Following the > > > > > > > > > > > > example on how toupdatean event: > > > > > > > > > > > >http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/developers_guide_php.html#Updati... > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I use the sample code posted to change the event > > > > > > > > > > > > title, all of the > > > > > > > > > > > > attendees (with exception of the organizer) will be > > > > > > > > > > > > reset to 'awaiting > > > > > > > > > > > > response' > > > > > > > > > > > > (<gd:attendeeStatusvalue="http://schemas.google.com/g/ > > > > > > > > > > > > 2005#event.invited"/>). > > > > > > > > > > > > > However if I make the same change via the GUI, the > > > > > > > > > > > > attendee status > > > > > > > > > > > > remains intact. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I can reproduce it also. > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change the title or time of an event through the > > > > > > > > > > > GUI, I see a > > > > > > > > > > > pop-up, "Would you like to send updates to existing > > > > > > > > > > > guests? Send|Don't > > > > > > > > > > > Send|Cancel" If I click "Send" the an updated invitation > > > > > > > > > > > is sent to the > > > > > > > > > > > attendees, immediately but the attendee status is not > > > > > > > > > > > changed from "Yes" > > > > > > > > > > > to "Awaiting Response". > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change the title or time of an event thought the > > > > > > > > > > > Java API, the > > > > > > > > > > > attendees are changed to "Awaiting Response," but e-mail > > > > > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > > > > > immediately sent to the attendees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone else give this a try and see if they can > > > > > > > > > > > > reproduce the > > > > > > > > > > > > behavior? I'm using PHP, btw. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe that the correct default response should be to > > > > > > > > > > > change the > > > > > > > > > > > attendee status when the title or other information for > > > > > > > > > > > the event > > > > > > > > > > > changes, *and* to send an updated invitation to the > > > > > > > > > > > attendees unless the > > > > > > > > > > > organizer indicates that it doesn't matter. As an > > > > > > > > > > > attendee, it makes a > > > > > > > > > > > difference to me that the title of the event has changed > > > > > > > > > > > from, "Using > > > > > > > > > > > Google Calender Effectively," to "Wasting Time in > > > > > > > > > > > Meetings" or that the > > > > > > > > > > > event has changed from Wednesday to Tuesday. > > > > > > > > > > > > The GUI behaves properly, allowing the organizer to make > > > > > > > > > > > minor changes > > > > > > > > > > > to the event without notifying every one if the change is > > > > > > > > > > > minor. The > > > > > > > > > > > organizer knows enough to know what is minor, the API > > > > > > > > > > > does not. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am holding out some possibility that changes made > > > > > > > > > > > through the API are > > > > > > > > > > > batched up and sent though e-mail after some delay, but I > > > > > > > > > > > haven't seen > > > > > > > > > > > them so far. This would be a sensible thing to do. You > > > > > > > > > > > don't want to be > > > > > > > > > > > notified every 5 minutes as the organizer runs though a > > > > > > > > > > > series of > > > > > > > > > > > changes perfecting the event details, but you do want to > > > > > > > > > > > be notified. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ray- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Calendar Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
