I updated the issue:

http://code.google.com/p/google-gdata/issues/detail?id=114

Can please read it and provide more detail on the one issue.

Frank
On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Kulvinder Singh wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
> Did you get a chance to work on this ?
>
> Thanks
> Kulvinder Singh
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Frank Mantek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:46:12 PM
> Subject: Re: GDataLoggingRequest
>
> I recreated this as issue 114 in the .net bug report list:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-gdata/issues/detail?id=114
>
> You submitted the bug to the services bug list, so i am going to  
> close that one.
>
> Frank Mantek
> Google
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Kulvinder Singh wrote:
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> Are you working on the changes/advancements in  
>> GDataLoggingRequest.cs ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kulvinder Singh
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Frank Mantek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:30:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: GDataLoggingRequest
>>
>> I will try, starting next week (i am busy with other stuff right  
>> now....)
>>
>> Frank
>> On Feb 12, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Kulvinder Singh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply. Yes, i am also using the  
>>> LoggingRequestFactory and came up with the issues i mentioned.
>>>
>>> I have filed a bug at 
>>> http://code.google.com/p/gdata-issues/issues/detail?id=351
>>>
>>> Can you please solve this at the earliest ? Since, you yourself  
>>> has written everything on Logging, i think you can do it quite  
>>> quickly (if you get some bandwidth. Right ?)
>>>
>>> I hope we can improve this logging stuff to a much better level.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Kulvinder Singh
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Frank Mantek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 9:21:29 PM
>>> Subject: Re: GDataLoggingRequest
>>>
>>> Actually, that is more a matter of feature discussion. I wrote the  
>>> logging code primarily to help me debug issues on systems that do  
>>> not have sophisticated tools like Fiddler readily available.
>>>
>>> So, yes it is not perfect. I have no idea why the request file is  
>>> never created for you (this works fine for me), and that it does  
>>> not log headers is a known limitation.
>>>
>>> So please file bugs/issue reports against that. I am more than  
>>> happy to look into enhancing it - i assumed so far i am the only  
>>> one using it :)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Frank Mantek
>>> Google
>>> On Feb 11, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Kulvinder Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Following is the code for Execute() in GDataLoggingRequest :
>>>>
>>>>         public override void Execute()
>>>>         {
>>>>             if (this.RequestCopy != null)
>>>>             {
>>>>                 this.RequestCopy.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
>>>>                 SaveStream(this.RequestCopy, this.strInput);
>>>>                 this.RequestCopy.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
>>>>
>>>>             }
>>>>             try
>>>>             {
>>>>                 base.Execute();
>>>>
>>>>             }
>>>>             catch (GDataRequestException re)
>>>>             {
>>>>                 Tracing.TraceMsg("Got into exception handling for  
>>>> base.execute");
>>>>                 HttpWebResponse response = re.Response as  
>>>> HttpWebResponse;
>>>>
>>>>                 if (response != null)
>>>>                 {
>>>>                     Stream req = response.GetResponseStream();
>>>>                     SaveStream(req, this.strOutput);
>>>>                 }
>>>>                 throw;
>>>>             }
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The catch block catches only the GDataRequestException and when i  
>>>> fetched the list of calendars using a wrong password, it doesnt  
>>>> write the response stream.
>>>>
>>>> Is this correct ?
>>>>
>>>> Also, GDataRequest.xml is never created (See  
>>>> GDataLoggingRequestFactory) but the GDataResponse.xml and  
>>>> GDataTraffic.log is created.
>>>>
>>>> GDataTraffic.log just writes the XML Request and Response with no  
>>>> carriage returns between them for differentiation.
>>>>
>>>> Also, The factory doesnt write the headers which were sent to  
>>>> google but the same thing is available with Phython Google  
>>>> Calendar API.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Kulvinder Singh
>>>>
>>>> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!  
>>>> Mobile. Try it now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!  
> Search.
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Calendar Data API" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-dataapi?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to