On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:47 PM, KeithB <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'll have more time to look into this later in the afternoon, but my > quick guess is that Google doesn't auto-scale your data when you use > SIMPLE or EXTENDED encoding. I'm sure if you converted your data to > text format and used data scaling (CHDS) your graphs would look/scale > fine. I'm guessing that Google assumes your values range from 0-61 > (simple) and 0-4095 (extended). Your first example uses simple > encoding while your second example uses extended encoding. I have not > needed to do any graphing with large data sets that would require > encoding so I can't say for sure. I'll look into this more later. Thanks Keith, for the correct and quick explanation. Parameter CHDS is indeed ignored for simple and extended encoding, and thus you have to scale your data yourself. marcus > > > Good luck, > K > > On Feb 25, 11:38 am, Andi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Has anybody an idea why I get this strange result for the 2nd array? I > > can't find my fault and got still the same problem. > > > > > -- Google Switzerland GmbH (CH-020.4.028.116-1) If you received this communication by mistake, don't forward it to anyone, erase all copies of it, including all attachments, and please let me know it went to you by mistake. Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Chart API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-chart-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
