on another matter relating to serving files from google code: i have a web site that serves pages and image content direct from google code and there is a puzzlinh inconsistency in the way those pages are served.
accessing images direct from the repository works fine; e.g. <img src="http://iccle.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/share/img/ bayesVsOthers.png"> also, i can slurp in page content using curl under php using similar style URLs (i.e. direct to iccle.googlecode.com/svn/trunk...) but, i'm i try to serve my css style sheets from google code (e.g. http://iccle.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/site/screen.css) then something goes wrong and the page renders as if it can't find the style sheet. i can't tell is this an issue at the google end or if it is a matter that i should raise with my ISP comments anyone? thanks! tim menzies On Sep 11, 3:45 pm, xliteration <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot, Doug. Also, I was reading somewhere that you can set the > mime-type of file to text/html. Is that for svn only or downloads > also? > > Also, I guess google code hosting does not have bandwidth quotas, only > disk quotas. right? > > Last, but not the least - how do I update a JS file after more than 50 > downloads? I don't want to create versions in my downloads since a > bookmarklet will keep on referencing the old JS download. > > Many thanks, > ~ Xliterate > > On Sep 11, 1:18 pm, doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The reason the browser pops up that dialog is that the Downloads > > feature sets an HTTP header called "Content-Disposition" that tells > > the browser to treat the contents as an "attachment". However, > > browsers don't do this for all static content: it applies to HTML, but > > not to <script src> or <img>. This is why many projects serve > > their .js files using the Downloads feature. > > > You should serve your .html files from your Subversion repository > > (http://indic.googlecode.com/svn/). Your indic project doesn't have > > any content checked in yet, so you'll need to use svn to add the > > content. You can find instructions on how to do this > > athttp://code.google.com/p/indic/source/checkout > > > On Sep 9, 1:38 pm, xliteration <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't want to use GModules hosting if I can use Google Code for > > > serving the js files. I am hoping somebody can clarify these doubts. > > > > On Sep 8, 12:31 pm, xliteration <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I recently started an open source project > > > > onhttp://code.google.com/p/indic/ > > > > > One of the pieces of code is a bookmarklet which users can download to > > > > use transliteration on any web page. That means serving files out of > > > > the downloads section of the website. The JS files are being served ok > > > > but I want to know if Google Code is a reliable solution (bandwidth/ > > > > latency wise) to serve files to users. > > > > > Secondly, I tried to create a bookmarklet which fetches HTML file from > > > > google code and it prompts to download HTML file instead of opening > > > > it. Maybe, that is intended by design (security concerns?). I was > > > > wondering if there is another way to do that. > > > > > Third, if I update a JS file, since users have reference to old JS > > > > file - what should I do to update the users? Google code disallows me > > > > to change the file contents of a file made available for download. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > ~ Xliterate --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
