LGPL version was already added as an issue: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1355
I would interpret the license as LGPL 3.0, so I will update my file headers accordingly. On Aug 16, 2:26 am, Gerhard Olsson <[email protected]> wrote: > If additional permissions are not allowed, LGPL would be the viable > option. However, the LGPL version is not specified for Google code. > I am not sure what that means legally as LGPL v2.1 is not fully > compatible with LGPL v3 > (you need to convert the license in some > situations)http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility > The compatibility to other licenses also differs. For instance Apache > license is compatible with LGPLv3 but not > LGPLv2.1http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
