> > That "Chris" thinks the license is "seriously flawed" doesn't interest > me and I don't care if he's a google founder. That a community site > should, as its criteria, have that a decision is up to the personal > tastes of one or two people, in my mind is "Seriously Flawed."
I don't know where you've seen someone saying it was "seriously flawed" but to know the reason why there is only a small set of open source license you should read that http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/MakingHostingBetter the part where it says [quote] In addition, we think that license proliferation is bad for the open source community, so we only allow a subset of licenses to be used on Google Code as a way of discouraging license proliferation. License proliferation means the creation and use of new OSS licenses that have no reason for existing. There are over 200 open source approved licenses, most of which are variants of existing licenses that do not add much value. This state of affairs makes compliance with open source licenses a nightmare ... [/quote] see nothing to be angry about zwetan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.
