If you want legal advice, you should ask a lawyer. But AGPL projects
are welcome on Google Code, and the fact that you might also sell
commercial licenses for the code is not a problem for us, as long as
the project you host on Google Code is open source.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Roger Parkinson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Your answer was about maintaining two different source repositories.
> My question was about maintaining just one, in Google Code.
> Perhaps my "Can we just keep one source version (in GC) licensed as
> AGPL and offer the commercial version elsewhere, keeping the supported
> binaries on the proprietary server?"
> was unclear in that I meant the proprietary server would hold ONLY the
> binaries, not the source.
>
> We have no interest in keeping the source closed. But if someone else
> is making money from it then we figure they can kick some our way,
> hence the choice of AGPL
> rather than Apache licence. Sure, there will be people who ignore this
> and rip us off. But there are enough good people out there who won't
> and we are only interested in dealing with the good guys.
>
> For this reason the issue tracker on Google code would be the master
> (and only) issue tracker.
> We'll cross the contributor licence issue when we get other
> contributors.
> For the moment the project is well developed on a local server and the
> result of this discussion will drive where we publish the source.
>
> I think I do need to hear a definitive answer from the Google Code
> Team as to whether this is legal, after all they police these issues.
> But I appreciate your answer.
> R
>
> On Dec 19, 4:20 am, Bruno Santos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> AFAIK, the idea is as follows:
>> 1- If you provide the source code for the paid version directly on
>> another repository in the same project as the open source version, you
>> cannot then say that the code in that new repository to be closed
>> source... because it's on the open public for everyone to see. You
>> might try to set a license that refrains users from using the source
>> code without payment, but you'll sooner or later loose you case in
>> court. This is why there are so many software licenses out there ;)
>>
>> 2- The Issue tracker on the open source project cannot be used for the
>> paid version, unless the bugs reported there and that get fixed in the
>> paid version will sooner or later crawl onto the open source
>> version... but preferably sooner than later, otherwise you're bound to
>> get repercussions from users and Google.
>>
>> 3- The "Contributor License Agreement" is something that is already
>> done in several open source projects. If the people don't like it,
>> then they are free to fork the project and abide by the license that
>> applies to the original project. The fork also has to take into
>> account trademarks of the original project, since although the source
>> code is publicly available, doesn't mean that its trademarked name can
>> be abused by others.
>>
>> Final note: I picked up on this thread from your bug 
>> report:http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=6101
>>
>> If you have any more questions, feel free to ask :)
>>
>> On Dec 16, 3:24 pm, Roger Parkinson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Referring 
>> > tohttp://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting/browse_thread/thre...
>> > Does Phillipe have to host hiscommercialsource on his proprietary
>> > server as well as on Google Code?
>> > We're thinking of doing much the same but we don't want to have to
>> > maintain two source copies.
>> > Can we just keep one source version (in GC) licensed as AGPL and offer
>> > thecommercialversion
>> > elsewhere, keeping the supported binaries on the proprietary server?
>> > Thanks
>

-- 
Jacob Lee <[email protected]>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Project Hosting on Google Code" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.

Reply via email to