Actually we can also find that, in the top 25 of round 3 in last year, only 6 of them were also in the top 25 of final onsite round, which shows that the result is really quite random and luck-dependent. 25 is too small as the number of finalists for a global famous competition all over the world.
On Aug 13, 2:46 pm, x10000year <[email protected]> wrote: > Why? It was 100 in last year and last last last year. 25 seems too > competitive and chanceful. > > It makes me a little sad because it is somewhat hard for me to get the > top 25, but somewhat easy to get the top 100. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
