I was of the same opinion and tried to program in Java. But you know I was fighting the language instead of language helping me. Well let me try today. I hope to qualify to think about future options.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Hawston LLH <[email protected]> wrote: > in fact, i dont think the raw coding speed will be significantly different, > if you use any of the high level languages. The key issue is whether u can > figure it out how to solve the problem in your brain first, i think that > will take much of the coding time, than the raw typing time. > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Douglas Drumond <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> But for big input files, 8 minutes might not be enough, I don't know. >> I'll try some examples today, before qualification round begins to see if >> it's feasible. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:03 AM, malugu satyajit < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I guess it should be ok.. 4 minutes is a long long time ;) >>> Development speed is what gives us points here. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Douglas Drumond < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be nice. I'm thinking in doing it so, but I'm a little afraid >>>> of running speed. >>>> >>>> Douglas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:35 AM, malugu satyajit < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> For this contest, is anyone coding in Ruby. I thought it would be a >>>>> good choice because of its brevity and coding speed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Satyajit >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Satyajit >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- Satyajit --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
