Round 1A was a lot easier also regarding the problems ...
And to qualify you needed 9 points against 45 for the round 1B.

Regards,
Cyril.

On Sep 13, 9:49 am, Асямов Игорь <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree about that Round 1A was easiest to qualified, but not in problems,it
> was harder than in 1B Round.
>
> 2009/9/12 Marian <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I second that.
> > Although I performed miserably and I though I'll have to compete in
> > the morning round after I realized that my large dataset submission
> > was wrong (losing 30 points), I was surprised that I was qualified
> > with only 10 points.
>
> > On Sep 12, 7:54 am, Vexorian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Apparently the easiest round was 1A. With only 2000~ competitors
> > > getting a positive score, and people advancing by just doing a brute
> > > force algorithm for A.
>
> > > On Sep 9, 6:19 pm, Brian Watkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > It looks like I've been assigned to all the rounds: 1A, 1B, and 1C.
> > > > Maybe you have, too.
>
> > > > Which do you figure will be the easiest to advance in?  And which will
> > > > be the hardest?
>
> > > > The first round will probably be the hardest because all the top
> > > > coders will advance leaving only the dregs to compete against in the
> > > > later rounds.
>
> > > > But the last round will really be the hardest because it will be full
> > > > of people who didn't manage to advance yet fighting for their very
> > > > survival in Code Jam.
>
> > > > On the other hand, the middle round will be the hardest because it is
> > > > the most convenient time for the giant avalanche of genius Chinese
> > > > coders.
>
> > > > What do you think?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to