if it's about the percentage, Cuban .... must be even better then 
Russians :P. 1/1 passed round 1.
qasim zeeshan wrote:
> Technically Russians are better than Chinese because there were just 
> 519 participants and 336 of them are in Round 2  
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     China is in big lead in Round 1.
>
>     I have compiled some region wise statistics here:
>     
> http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-2009-round1-some.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Matteo Landi <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
>         Just wait for an update from:
>         http://www.go-hero.net/jam
>         There we can country stats from 2008.
>
>         On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Baroukh<[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>         >
>         > I am also interested in this. Especially the country answer...
>         >
>         > On Sep 4, 4:44 am, Paulo Eduardo Neves <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>         >> Does anybody here have participation statistics for the
>         first round? I
>         >> can see that 9724 candidates submitted solutions for the first
>         >> problem. How many participants the context had? How many by
>         country?
>         > >
>         >
>
>
>
>         --
>         M@
>         http://matteolandi.altervista.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Qasim Zeeshan
> PUCIT, PU Alumni '04
> Software Engineer
> CambridgeDocs Pakistan
> A Division of Document Science | EMC USA
> http://qzeeshan.blogspot.com/
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to