The same thing happened with my program. It looks as if the official data is only concerned with checking efficiency for large cases, not smaller border cases.
On May 10, 8:13 am, Mikhail Dektyarev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > I think, my solution for Problem C will work not correctly, if R < (number > of step when we enter to a cycle). > But I couldn't find an example, when we enter to a cycle later then after > the first running. In small and large inputs there is no such example, too. > Can anybody find it, or it doesn't exist? > > -- > Best regards, Дектярев Михаил > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-codejam" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
