Thanks a lot dude :) Now i know what the problem was... and nope, i am not qualified :( I wish u guys all the luck n see u all in next GCJ :)
On May 15, 1:21 am, Amtep <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 11, 9:23 am, Chethan B <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I still don't get it.. When i try to run epsalon's code i get the > > output in the format > > Case #32: 1.46888007111242e+015 > > how to get the exact value without changing epsalon's code?? > > I tried epsalon's code myself. When I run it on my normal system (64- > bit, > perl v5.10.1, Debian) I get exact answers. When I run it on my netbook > (32-bit, perl v5.10.0, Debian) I get some answers in e-notation. I > think > that the significant difference is the 64-bit system, and that > epsalon > was using one too. I guess this means that perl falls back on floating > point numbers when you exceed the platform's integer range. > That's good to know. I've gotten used to the behavior of ruby and > python, > which fall back on their big-integer classes. > > I'm sorry that you ran into this the hard way. I hope you still > qualified. > > Richard Braakman > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-codejam" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
