29 not surprising 09 10 10 and surprising 09 09 11 30 not surprising 10 10 10 and surprising 09 10 11
What you mentioned would only be a problem if p > 10. For p ≤ 10 the not surprising triplet of scores has already a score >= p. And that is what the problem statement says about p: 0 ≤ p ≤ 10 So even if you haven't thought about it, chances are good that your solution is correct. Best regards, Matthias Gugel On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Krzysztof Leszczyński <[email protected]> wrote: > First, yayayayyay to Codejam team for the wonderful piece of fun we had > yesterday (yesterday in my time zone). > > After reading the contest analysis I believe I submitted the incorrect > solution to Dancing With Googlers. I haven't found that not only 0 and 1 are > special but also 29 and 30. Still I see all my submissions marked as > correct. > > Dear Google Code Jam team. Please feel free to mark them as incorrect. I > just got input that didn't test my code sufficiently well. > > Thank you very much for this fantastic contest. > > Krzysztof Leszczyński (contestant “chewbacca”) > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Code Jam" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/rSbv_CkPTgAJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
