Yes I agree that is a bit nicer On Monday, May 7, 2012 9:54:25 PM UTC+1, A wrote: > > Very nice. I have a version of Safety in Numbers that I consider just a > tiny bit simpler: > > > http://codejamdaemon.blogspot.it/2012/05/safety-in-numbers-gcj-2012-round-1b.html > > A. > > On Monday, 7 May 2012 22:10:55 UTC+2, Chris Knott wrote: >> >> Here are commented solutions... >> http://paste2.org/p/2012908 >> http://paste2.org/p/2012907 >> http://paste2.org/p/2012904 >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/p4uBaUPLCgAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
