>I don't think even a hyper efficient C implementation would have got the same algorithm to solve for n=10^100 Many contestants with the full 250pts did right that. You don't use numeric variables any more, you use strings of course, but you even don't need much code.
Bye, Olaf. 2013/4/14 Linqing Wang <[email protected]> > c does do well in performance, but java supplies more tools which makes > program easier. > On Apr 14, 2013 10:44 AM, "sk" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I do use java, and even though one can compete in codejam, do you agree >> that C++ is a better languague to compete in code jam. I see the top 5 are >> using C++. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google Code Jam" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/z-rqRNj92FYJ. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Code Jam" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
