For the test set 3, we don't know exact upper bounds, so there's a possibility that all upper bounds are 9, 99, 999, etc.
среда, 6 мая 2020 г., 19:59:09 UTC+3 пользователь E. Choroba написал: > > Hi Yury, > > It's not exactly true. If you run the query for let's say 51, there will > be > much less results starting with digits 6-9 than for let'say 99. So, you > can't > assign the digits randomly, but according to their frequencies. > > Ch. > > ============================================================================== > > > On Wed, 6 May 2020, Юрий Горшенин wrote: > > Hello, > > > > during round 1C I succeeded to solve TestSet1 and TestSet2, but failed > to > > solve TestSet3 for the problem "Overrandomized". For the TestSet3 I > tried > > to do following: just collect all characters from leading positions of > > responses and assign them arbitrary to digits, except zero (as server > > respond without leading zeros, according to problem statement). Then, > > assign rest of characters to the rest of digits. This solution received > WA, > > but I don't understand why - IMHO any valid assignment of characters to > > digits should work for TestSet3, as upper bounds are unknown. > > > > Thanks, Yury. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Google Code Jam" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to googl...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-code/d2e9cb2f-9489-4c00-9de3-35ff6e61a213%40googlegroups.com. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-code/7f001629-b7c6-41c7-8292-2af9d64acb54%40googlegroups.com.
