got a reply on twitter from Brendan. It seems if you really don't have a requirement of a pod in one flannel overlay talking to a pod in another flannel overlay, you can have two flannel overlays supported in the same kube cluster.
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 7:08:47 PM UTC-7, Mayank wrote: > > Re-asking this question. Does anyone see issues using this configuration ? > > > On Friday, May 6, 2016 at 7:41:43 PM UTC-7, Mayank wrote: >> >> Hi All >> We are exploring running multiple flannel overlays to segregate traffic, >> in a single kubernetes cluster. Does anyone see any issues with this >> approach ? Is this supported or not. I dont see a issue as long as the >> minions dont need to talk to each other. >> >> In our network part of the minions will host kpods in flannel subnet 1, >> and part of the minions will host kpods with ip in flannel subnet 2. >> >> Let me know if anyone has experience with such a configuration ? >> >> -Mayank >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Containers at Google" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-containers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
