I'm a devout user of WebStickies. This is not good...truly not good at all.
Julie Krueger On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Dan (Google Employee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hi Julie, > > Many of the features of inlined gadgets can be replicated without > inlining, and for that reason, many inlined gadget developers have > converted their gadgets or type="html" and type="url". The most > popular inlined gadgets that existed prior to deprecation continue to > function. Many of the reasons inlined gadgets were originally offered > have become obsolete, and the advantages inlined gadgets have over > generic gadgets will continue to diminish. > > Best, > Dan > > On Dec 8, 8:32 am, Julie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Over the last couple of years I have become a dedicated google user, > > including iGoogle. Like everyone else, I assume, I am constantly > > tinkering with it, adding gadgets, removing some, tweaking it so it > > suits my business needs the best. W/out some of the inline gadgets > > which have made my work feasible, I may just move away from all of > > google in general. > > > > The concept google is based on is open-ness to new ideas, creativity, > > and lots of room for people to create and use what works well for > > them. > > > > I suspect that the reason this thread doesn't get more activity is > > that users really aren't aware this thread in this forum exists. > > > > As a user, I am deeply disappointed in google, which for a long time I > > have been a strong advocate of. > > > > Julie > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
