Hello Rob, Updates done in the gadget for over 24h are still not reflected in the gadget A few examples: - http://www.ljmsite.com/google/gadgets/worldclocks.xml - http://www.ljmsite.com/google/gadgets/worldclocks4.xml
If you can force these 2 to be re-fetched ASAP that would be very helpful as the DST time changes, which are in the gadget itself, are currently missing for many users. Cheers, Jerome On Oct 26, 2:18 am, Rob Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jerome, > Can you give the url of the gadget? > > iGoogle respects the cache control headers sent with your gadget and should > update within hours if the gadget spec changes. Currently, if only message > bundles or supporting files change this may not be detected. > > Regards, > Rob Russell > Google Developer Relations > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jerome <[email protected]> wrote: > > I continue receiving several customers reports that the gadget is out > > of date on a daily basis... Any Googler's input on this issue, and a > > resolution ETA? > > > Cheers, > > > Jerome > > > On Oct 7, 2:26 am, Jerome <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The gadget XML specs used to take around a couple of hours to become > > > live on users' iGoogle page. This has been working great for years. > > > > In the past week, I have been receiving loads of problem reports from > > > users of my gadgets saying they are seeing on their iGoogle page a > > > gadget that is a few days old to over a week old (my gadget spec is > > > updated on an infrequent basis). I instructed them to do a Ctrl + F5 > > > while on iGoogle and for most of them it solved the issue. A few users > > > (on Google Chrome especially) are reporting that the Ctrl + F5 does > > > not help though. > > > > My gadget has 100,000s of users and it is clearly working as expected > > > for many of them, but there is a Google introduced problem impacting > > > quite a few. As I can not reproduce the issue on my test systems, I > > > can not give you more input, but my guess is that someone at Google > > > has been experimenting with http caching headers in an attempt to save > > > bandwidth but broke how gadgets have been working for years. > > > > Please look into this, and let me know if you need further > > > informations. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jerome > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<Google-Gadgets-API%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en.
