Comment #7 on issue 274 by gk5885: Snapshot repository for guice 2? http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=274
@aquatopia et al. I have a difficult time seeing the merit of forks such as these. As the sole person working on mavenizing google projects, I would be glad to work with contributors to get _correct_, authoritative metadata and repositories set up. Efforts like these just pollute the artifact pool with copies of the same artifacts with less-correct metadata. In fact, distributing artifacts under a com.google groupId is contrary to the maven naming conventions (http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html) because it is _not_ a domain you control. Please, please, please stop fragmenting the user base. Contributions are welcome. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
