Comment #9 on issue 131 by gili.tzabari: partial injection a.k.a. factory generation http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=131
I tend to agree that parameter ordering alone was enough for me in the past. Then again, in an ideal world Guice would (somehow) generate the factory for me directly from the constructor prototype. If you had such an automatic mechanism you could automatically add @Named annotations if they were missing by reading the parameter name and using that as the @Named value. I don't think this is technically possible without two compilation phases though... Alternatively, you could provide an unsafe "Injector.getInstance(Class clazz, Object... arguments)" method and fail at runtime. This would remove any sort of CRUD code at the cost of type safety. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
